One way of implementing it, which is used to get the C equivalent of
"for k, v in pairs(t) do ... end": (MIT license, if anyone cares)
int luaL_pairs(lua_State *L, int index) {
/* Start of iteration? */
if (lua_isnil(L, -1)) {
lua_checkstack(L, 2);
if (luaL_getmetafield(L, index, "__pairs")) {
lua_pushvalue(L, index);
lua_replace(L, -4);
lua_replace(L, -4);
lua_pop(L, 1);
lua_call(L, 1, 3);
if(lua_isnil(L, -3)) {
lua_pop(L, 2);
lua_call(L, 0, 0);
}
}
}
/* Continuation of iteration */
if(lua_isnil(L, -3)) {
if (lua_next(L, index))
return 1;
lua_pop(L, 2);
return 0;
}
else {
lua_pushvalue(L, -3);
lua_pushvalue(L, -3);
lua_pushvalue(L, -3);
lua_remove(L, -4);
lua_call(L, 2, 2);
if (lua_isnil(L, -2)) {
lua_pop(L, 4);
return 0;
}
return 1;
}
}
Usage is then similar to, but not quite the same as, lua_next:
/* table is in the stack at index 't' */
lua_settop(L, lua_gettop(L) + 3); /* state variables and first key */
while (luaL_pairs(L, t) != 0) {
/* uses 'key' (at index -2) and 'value' (at index -1) */
printf("%s - %s\n",
lua_typename(L, lua_type(L, -2)),
lua_typename(L, lua_type(L, -1)));
/* removes 'value'; keeps 'key' for next iteration */
lua_pop(L, 1);
}
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:20 PM, David Burgess<dabsoft@gmail.com> wrote:
OK then. How about luaL_pairs()?
On 15/1/2010 9:50 AM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
I think we should have lua_pairs() to match lua_next()
__pairs is not a core metamethod, just like __tostring: it is provided
by the base library. So, it cannot influence the C API.