Re: LoadLibrary and 5.2

[Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu <theo19k@...>]

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:36:30 +1100
David Burgess <dabsoft@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sometime ago some powerful arguments for no change were placed on the 
> list. I believe the arguments are still valid.

These were the arguments I found so far:
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-05/msg00397.html
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-08/msg00618.html

But maybe I haven't searched the archive deep enough because I'd like
to see this change being made as well - I've been using it for some
time for myself.

-- 
Theo