Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available

[David Burgess <dabsoft@...>]

You can do it individually.
At one stage my coding style was to wrap spurious warnings like:

#pragma warning( disable : 4514 )

<code ... />

#pragma warning( enable : 4514 )

This also highlights to the programmer that One (hopefully) knows what 
they are doing. MS use this approach in their SDK code.
I cant remember it offhand but I know you can do the same in GCC

DB

Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
> > Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
> > > (Any compiler should provide a standard (and documented) way to silence
> > > each of its warnings.)
> > >
> > > -- Roberto
> > MS VCs (all of them I think use
> > e.g.
> > #pragma warning( disable : 4514 )
> >
> > #pragma warning( disable : errorlist  ... )
> >
> > I am not sure about gcc.
> >
> > However one of the rules of #pragma methinks is that compilers are
> > supposed to ignore it if they do not understand it.
>
> What I meant was a way to silence each instance of them, individually.
> Some way to say "here I know what I am doing". Things like extra
> parentheses, explicit casts, casts to void, etc.
>
> -- Roberto