[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work1) now available
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:30:16 -0200
> > [...]
> > union luai_Cast { double l_d; long l_l; };
> > #define lua_number2int(i,d) \
> > { volatile union luai_Cast u; u.l_d = (d) + 6755399441055744.0; (i) =
> > u.l_l; }
> > [...]
> >
> There was a thread in which I comment on this type of usage with a union
> yesterday quoting the C standard that it is undefined behavior, it was even
> followed by a post from Roberto who stated that [because it is undefined] is
> why Lua does not use it ?
This *is* a dirty trick. My message was about using a dirty trick just
to remove a warning about a normal usage.
(Any compiler should provide a standard (and documented) way to silence
each of its warnings.)
-- Roberto