[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2 Binary Compatibility
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:49:05 +0200
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
> ABI breakages are unavoidable, and 5.1->5.2 transition have all rights
> to do them.
Yes, lhf was very clear on that. But if it takes a _little_ work to
preserve compatibility with _most_ modules, why not? If it ain't
broken, why fix?
> I believe that the desired behavior for require is to detect Lua
> version mismatch and skip the module to try to find a next one that
> fits better. I'm not sure if it is doable though...
Well, note that lua5.2 is still using '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.1/'.
There's always the distinct _VERSION global.
steve d.
