[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: parameter table
- From: Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@...>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:59:34 -0500
On 2009-12-21, Miles Bader <email@example.com> wrote:
> Leo Razoumov <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > It is surprising that LuaJIT-2.0.0 is 3 times slower than the Lua
> > interpreter in the case of argument table. Actually, in my tests
> > (Ubuntu-9.04 Linux, 2GHz DualCore x86) LuaJIT-1.1.5 is 2 times faster
> > than the Lua interpreter for argument tables
> > What gives?
> I used more repetitions for luajit -- 10 times the number to be exact,
> so luajit is actually about 3 (10/3) times _faster_ than lua.
Auch! My bad. Did not count all the zeros. This is why I prefer to
write 5E6 or 5E7 to spare myself eye-strain.