[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Standard Libraries: (was: and Lua marches on)
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:59:46 +0200
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Mark Hamburg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Does this return a new iterator? I would presume that it would.
I'm tending in this direction, as indicated in the latest update:
We could always use collect() to get a table. But traditionally map()
is a list-to-list operation; this is a iterator-to-list operation,
which is starting to feel like it's going between the two
But here I would like to know what people feel about this, whether
their expectation is that map is purely list-to-list, and that another
function (map_iter) should be provided for sequence-to-sequence.