[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua is not acronym
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:08:24 +0300
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 16:09, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
>> Giving a link to http://www.lua.org/about.html#name is not good
>> enough, as required information there is surrounded by a lot of other
> That's a gripe I have with all browsers I know: they do not show that text
> at the top of the page apparently because they don't want to show empty
> space at the bottom.
As I get it, browsers just "don't know" that there should be empty
space at the bottom.
The text would be at the top of the page, if you'd add that empty
space explicitly (with <BR/> tags for example). No, I don't think that
it is a good idea to do so.
> Anyway, how could we improve that text or link?
The text is, probably, good enough — for a general purpose page. I
would probably highlighted 'Please do not write it as "LUA"' in bold
for extra emphasis. Or even made all key points bold for easier
I feel, however, that the issue with LUA capitalization worth a
separate micro-page. Perhaps it can be positioned as a kind of brand
When people do not read consciously, the concept needs to be hammered
into their minds to stay there.
Wrong Lua name capitalization is an issue so common, that it worth