[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Short function definition syntax; thoughts on Lua
- From: Jerome Vuarand <jerome.vuarand@...>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:55:05 +0100
2009/12/4 Cosmin Apreutesei <cosmin.apreutesei@gmail.com>:
>> The one thing that really struck me about Lua is that Lua programs looks
>> like Lua. They don't go fancy-syntax fishing elsewhere. That's kind of
>> unusual for a script language nowadays.
>
> Some of that comes form its liberating semantics, but there's also
> some crafted screen aesthetics going on which many dynamic languages
> seem to overlook, and nice to see them in Lua:
> - [...]
> - economic use of symbols, choosing those that look good on the
> screen and are easy to type (eg. look at the conversation about
> choosing a length operator some years ago)
For symbols that's very variable on localized keyboards. On a fr_FR
keyboard, # is awkward to type, and ~= is even worse. English words
have the advantage that they are easy to type on most (all?)
latin-alphabet-based keyboards.