[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta1
- From: Vyacheslav Egorov <mister.aleph@...>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:35:48 +0600
> if it were compiled with LuaJIT-2, would it "just work"?
No, it was already discussed before (when Mike announced that he
altered bytecode format). Someone needs to provide a new bytecode
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Benjamin Tolputt
> Joshua Jensen wrote:
>> Metalua, I believe, outputs bytecode. I haven't had much success with
>> its source output. So, I imagine, without a bytecode translator or a
>> LuaJIT emitter added to Metalua, it isn't possible to use Metalua
>> extensions with LuaJIT.
> Which would be an incredible pain for me... Metalua is a god-send for
> using idioms like try/catch/finally in Lua. I haven't dug too deep into
> Metalua, but if it were compiled with LuaJIT-2, would it "just work"?
> Benjamin Tolputt
> Analyst Programmer