[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaJIT-2.0.0-beta1
- From: Mike Pall <mikelu-0911@...>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:25:16 +0100
Juris Kalnins wrote:
> Looking at lj_str_new.
> Just curious, was there something wrong with that fast string hash patch
> that used Jenkins' hash?
Not with the hash per-se but with the selection of the characters
to hash. It badly hashed strings that contained URLs. Since I
presume this is a common use case, I pulled it. I didn't have the
time to come up with something better (yet). :-/