[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: UTF-8 identifiers
- From: Miles Bader <miles@...>
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:51:28 +0900
Lyndon Nerenberg - VE6BBM/VE7TFX <email@example.com> writes:
>> There is a world of difference between fully integrating Unicode into
>> a grammar and making a patch to accept just any sequence of non-ascii
>> bytes as an identifier.
> I saw two points being discussed:
> 1) how to do it, and
> 2) surely this leads to madness through glyph obfuscation.
(1) is obvious, and (2) is a strawman ("Don't do that").
Anyway, I think Roberto's point is that the discussion about alternate
keywords etc, is not relevant.
"Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
where four map sheets join." -- Anon. British Officer in WW I