[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Next Version of Lua?
- From: Olivier Hamel <evilpineapple@...>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:26:29 -0400
steve donovan wrote:
That's another thing, anyone heard from his top-secret underground
laboratory on LuaJIT 2.x's progress? Has anyone considered
promoting/heiring him full time for LuaJIT? A x64 port would make this a
lot more portable & attractive for commercial/multi-platform apps,
though from what I know of assembly it'll be a pain to do (perhaps just
for me because I'm a complete newcomer to it).
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Olivier Hamel<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Roberto said they (inner Lua dev group) weren't happy with any known
implementation of bitwise operators, it would be helpful to know what they
are not pleased with so we may propose alternate solutions/implementations.
Mike Pall's LuaBit is likely to become a de-facto standard, expecially
when LuaJIT 2.x comes along and these operations are supported