Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:07:24 +0200

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Henk Boom <henk@henk.ca> wrote:
> 2) given that having init.lua does not solve any problem (see 1), it
> is best to take the simplest and least confusing approach.

But we're _used_ to it now..  Harmless, basically.

steve d.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo

References:
- Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, M Joonas Pihlaja
- Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, David Manura
- Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path, Henk Boom

Prev by Date: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
Next by Date: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
Previous by thread: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
Next by thread: Re: Request for ./?/init.lua in the default package.path
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread