[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 release candidate
- From: gary ng <garyng2000@...>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
the binding I wrote for xyssl(I think now is called polarssl) has a much smaller footprint and is also a wrapper around luasocket.
--- On Fri, 5/22/09, Joseph Stewart <email@example.com> wrote:
> From: Joseph Stewart <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: LuaSocket 2.0.3 release candidate
> To: "Lua list" <email@example.com>
> Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 2:52 AM
> Yuck... I'd prefer a documented
> method to integrate someone else's
> library rather than forcing the implementation.
> OpenSSL is too big for my targets and others probably would
> agree with me.
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Norbert Kiesel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 04:41 -0400, Diego Nehab wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >> I am placing the release candidate for LuaSocket
> 2.0.3 for public scrutiny at
> > Are there any plans of adding HTTPS support? I know
> of at least 2
> > different implementations (both using luasec), but
> would be really nice
> > to have a standard way.
> > </nk>