[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Simple XHTML (XML) parser/printer
- From: Miles Bader <miles@...>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:48:38 +0900
Tuomo Valkonen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Likewise, nothing stops a standard structural text-based format from
> using a nicer syntax. in this department, YAML has actually gained
> some support, although I find it a bit too strict and complex for
> arbitrary user-editable configuration files: it still remains more
> of a protocol/savefile format -- and, of course, totally unsuitable
> for documents.
Yeah,... in this respect, yaml seems even worse than xml, since it has
the significant-whitespace mess going on (worst idea ever...).
Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious.