[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings
- From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick@...>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:01:40 -0600
I want to add that width two hexadecimal escape sequences is the only
sensible width as the decimal ("\XXX") escape sequence is limited to
one byte in size (8 bits, a cap of 255 in decimal). The hexadecimal
escape sequence would then also have a one byte size limit.
Finally, I am also supportive of this feature. I feel in the future
with the growing use of lpeg that it will only become more sorely
missed.
--
-Patrick Donnelly
"One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing
to do and always a clever thing to say."
-Will Durant
- References:
- Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Ico
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Benjamin Tolputt
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Benjamin Tolputt
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Benjamin Tolputt
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Diego Nehab
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Bertrand Mansion
- Re: Feature proposal: \x## notation in strings, Roberto Ierusalimschy