[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: future of bytecode verifier
- From: Jorge <xxopxe@...>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:46:51 -0200
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:21 -0300, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
> The whole point is that providing a bytecode verifier that is flawed
> (even if it's only in malicious code) gives you an illusion of safety.
> And this is as bad, or actually worse, than having no verifier.
I say, stuck all that code in a module where it can peacefully grow to a
Turing-defeating AI the size of Windows Vista.
