[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Tokyo Cabinet
- From: Alexandre Bairos <alexandre.bairos@...>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:51:38 -0200
0.42 s for 1M records. Pretty impressive.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Petite Abeille
> <petite.abeille@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:06 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> I looked at it once as a "modern" replacement for Berkely DB 1.5, and
>>> DB1.5 might not have the nicest API, but it was faster.
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> 1.5
>
>> Is that so? Under what scenario?
>>
>> Perhaps slightly biased, but Mikio Hirabayashi own benchmark seems to
>> indicate otherwise:
>
> The bias may be that he didn't benchmark it against 1.5.
>
>> Tokyo Cabinet 1.3.5
>> read: 0.402
>> write 0.334
>>
>> Berkeley DB 4.6.21
> ^^^^^^
>
> 4.6
>
> We did our own benchmarks, and stuck with 1.5 because we didn't need
> the features the newer DBs had.
>
> Cheers,
> Sam
>
