[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Question about LuaInterface 2.0
- From: Thomas Harning <harningt@...>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:45:51 -0500
On Dec 30, 2008, at 7:32 PM, Ignacio Burgueño wrote:
It may be easier to use the older LuaInterface because it is not so
much running inside .Net, but is compiled to the .net platform and not
able to use normal Lua modules.
Robert Raschke wrote:
I don't think so. At least not with quite a bit of elbow grease.
LuaInterface runs Lua from inside .NET! (Same holds for LuaJava,
Lua is invoked from Java.)
Ok, thanks for your help. I think I'll need to wrap the .NET
assemblies in a COM component and use LuaCOM to invoke that.
LuaInterface < 2 was a P/Invoke-based Lua module that could use .Net.
Note that you would still need to have .Net as the 'host' application,
but wrapping it w/ LuaCOM could be a way around this.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature