[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: "Random" delays in execution
- From: "Jerome Vuarand" <jerome.vuarand@...>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:31:39 +0200
2008/10/24 Javier Guerra <javier@guerrag.com>:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Max van Rooij (van Rooij Electronics
> Design & Software Engineering) <mvrooij@vanrooij-edse.nl> wrote:
>> I have a hunch that Jerome is on the right track, by stating that each
>> new thread gets a copy of the cel table which gets marked for GC after
>> threads' end. If this is the case, then how to prevent it?
>
> as you already did: forcing a GC after terminating a thread.
>
> even better would be to reuse it, of course. for that, don't let it
> finish, but wrap into a loop that yields after the task is done.
>
> the drawback, of course, is a lot less isolation between tasks
The script creating the array is already not the same as the one run repeatedly.
Max: can you send us the C code loadin both scripts and running them ?