Re: LuaRocks with Windows/Visual Studio

[Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>]

On Thursday 28 August 2008, Mark Meijer wrote:
> Lastly, slightly off-topic, I am considering stepping away from Visual
> Studio for my day-to-day needs (I'm sick and tired of the
> compatibility problems). If anyone has any suggestions or
> considerations regarding what my next choice of compiler might be (for
> use on windows), I'm all ears. I'm not too keen on cygwin, but MinGW
> seems like a good choice.

for the (very) little development i do on windows, i've found MinGW to be the 
easiest.  also, it's the only compiler officially supported on windows by 
many open source packages. specifically, Qt GPL for windows can only be 
compiled with MinGW, and that's a huge point for me.


-- 
Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.