[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Idle Script Language 0.4
- From: Thomas Lauer <thomas.lauer@...>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:56:57 +0100
Fabien <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Thomas Lauer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > This beta version is released under an MIT-style licence.
> Uh, I don't think you could reasonably call it MIT-licensed unless you
> actually publish the sources...
Is that so?
IANAL and the text of the MIT license itself says absolutely nothing
about 'source code'. Perhaps it's so connected with open-source projects
that people come to expect source code release. But so far I thought
it's alright to be used in this context as well.
However, if someone is able and willing to show that my thinking is
misguided I will happily invent yet another license. The world needs
(At any rate, a full source code repository will be made available
shortly after Idle's 1.0 release.)