Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package]

[Hugo Etchegoyen <hetchegoyen@...>]

Title: Grupo Hasar

I am a fan of 'continue' and I have already advocated for it before. Why should you cancel the scope rule? The given example is clearly a programming error. Why should programmers be protected from such errors?

HE

Javier Guerra escribió:

On 2/25/08, Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@actcom.co.il> wrote:
  

IMO, the value of having 'continue' would be much greater than that of
 this scope rule. I'd love to see canceling this rule in favor of adding
 'continue'. That is, the _expression_-parameter of 'until' would resolve
 its variables in the scope enclosing the repeat loop.
    

i'd vote that way too.  but how to do the transition? adding warnings
to the compiler??


  

--

Ing. Hugo Eduardo Etchegoyen
Gerente Dto. Software de Base

Compañía Hasar | Grupo Hasar
Marcos Sastre y José Ingenieros
El Talar. Pacheco
[B1618CSD] Buenos Aires. Argentina
Tel [54 11] 4117 8900 | Fax [54 11] 4117 8998
E-mail: hetchegoyen@hasar.com
Visítenos en: www.hasar.com
Información legal y política de confidencialidad: www.grupohasar.com/disclaimer