Re: Need standard kernel supported class in Lua, was: Macros andexpressivity

[Stefan Sandberg <keffo.sandberg@...>]

Not to mention the fact that you'd also have to put down some standards 
regarding functional and ao programming,
otherwise this oo stuff is just fancy talk for people whining about how 
they miss java and python..
I'd rather have the lua core people spending their time on something 
more important regardless of which method people choose to use it, and 
let us trolling lunatics battle it out and see what wins in the end...

Keep the lua core unchained!

Javier Guerra wrote:
> On 1/15/08, Grellier, Thierry <t-grellier@ti.com> wrote:
>   
> > Why standard is synonym to poor performance to you? I mean yes standard
> > is priority one for me. But I would find "foolish" that standard is
> > implemented the less efficient way. Reasonably fast is hard to determine
> >     
>
> if it's standard, i has to be 'all enclosing'.  to get that are two
> approaches: bloat and better abstractions.
>
> guess what do most Lua'ists prefer?
>
>
>