Re: Why does numeric for loop not accept an explist?

[Duck <duck@...>]

> > i=1 repeat ... i = 1+3 until i>10

> Sure looks like an endless loop to me

Errr, i = i+3, of course.

Another of the avdantages of the "for equals" loop -- the loop conditions 
are easier to get right, or perhaps slightly harder to get wrong :-)