[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?
- From: Diego Nehab <diego@...>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:26:35 -0400 (EDT)
Hi,
Too agressive a solution?
I think it is too much work.
But it is work done only once, and for all.
Is it better to just have one binary for each CRT? Or
just forget it and let users do their own compiling?
If we have one binary for each CRT the users still can do
their own compiling.
The problem I face is that I don't want to have several
different versions of Visual Studio installed. It doesn't
make sense for an amateur like me.
Is it possible to prepare and release different sets of CRT
headers and import libraries that would be used by, say, GCC
or the latest free Visual Studio compiler, whatever it is?
That way we could use makefiles to generate all these
binaries using a single compiler.
Regards,
Diego
- References:
- RE: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Antonio Scuri
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, David Burgess
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Diego Nehab
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, David Burgess
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Diego Nehab
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, David Burgess
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Diego Nehab
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, David Burgess
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Thomas Lauer
- Re: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Diego Nehab
- RE: LuaBinaries executables for msvcr80.dll?, Antonio Scuri