[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Abominations of nature
- From: "steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:38:00 +0100
On 8/30/07, Thomas Breuel <tmbdev@gmail.com> wrote:
|> But don't discount an idea just because it's difficult to
> understand/implement (otherwise, we probably wouldn't have most modern
> programming languages in the first place).
>
> But I do, because the reason we're using Lua is that it's simple and small.
> The more complicated Lua becomes as a language, the less useful it becomes
> for us.
Precisely! We all understand that difficult things often require
difficult solutions. But straightforward things should be easy.
Otherwise we are wasting brain cycles on overelaboration and
unnecessary complexity.
steve d.
- References:
- Re: Features you would like to see, Mark Hamburg
- Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), David Given
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Fabien
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature, David Given
- Re: Abominations of nature, Thomas Breuel
- Re: Abominations of nature, Tom Barta
- Re: Abominations of nature, Thomas Breuel