[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Strange omission in lfs?
- From: "Andre Carregal" <carregal@...>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:34:28 -0300
On 8/25/07, David Kastrup <email@example.com> wrote:
> Considering the painstaking detail and completeness in the other
> entries, this looks more like an oversight than a conscious design
> decision to me.
In a way, yes. We are discussing the implementation details for such a
feature in the Kepler list if someone is interested:
Please consider joining the list if you would like to help us getting
this ready for the next version of LFS.
Thanks in advance,