Re: Strange omission in lfs?

["Andre Carregal" <carregal@...>]

On 8/25/07, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> Considering the painstaking detail and completeness in the other
> entries, this looks more like an oversight than a conscious design
> decision to me.

In a way, yes. We are discussing the implementation details for such a
feature in the Kepler list if someone is interested:
http://lists.luaforge.net/pipermail/kepler-project/2007-July/001019.html
http://lists.luaforge.net/pipermail/kepler-project/2007-August/001032.html

Please consider joining the list if you would like to help us getting
this ready for the next version of LFS.

Thanks in advance,

André