[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see)
- From: "Alex Queiroz" <asandroq@...>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:58:36 -0300
Hallo,
On 8/22/07, Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> > That's true, but some discipline can solve that. The usual
> > programming style in Scheme is functional, so side-effects are hardly
> > an issue.
>
> That is exactly my point. Multiple-shot continuations may be useful for
> Scheme (although I haven't seen *convincing* evidence [1]), but not for
> Lua, where side effects are the norm.
>
Well, I was not advocating them for Lua. :-)
Cheers,
--
-alex
http://www.ventonegro.org/
- References:
- Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), David Given
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Alex Queiroz
- Re: Abominations of nature (was: Features you would like to see), Roberto Ierusalimschy