Re: Apache Portable Runtime

[Peter Odding <xolox@...>]

Vijay Aswadhati wrote:
> Just an FYI:
> Ryan Bloom has this to say, "...APR's reliance on pools were my absolute
> biggest mistake in APR..."[1].
I've read the message before and would like to see the memory pools be made 
optional. Though I'm not sure myself about the best approach.

> It would be wise not to expose the memory pool notion to the Lua-APR binding.
I'm definitely not going to introduce memory pools in the interface. That would 
ruin the simplicity of Lua.

 - Peter