Re: Wanted: ncurses & utf-8 string library

[Asko Kauppi <askok@...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


For my own side; I stay away SWIG.  Last (only) time I looked, it's  
such a complicated system. But it would be acceptable in a project  
where the whole C API has been planned for scripting (and SWIG) from  
day one.  Otherwise, I like keeping things simple.

Any pointers to the existing ncurses?

- -asko


David Given kirjoitti 4.12.2006 kello 19.56:

> Asko Kauppi wrote:
> [...]
> > As to the other half, I started making ncurses module today.
> > Estimated ready in 2 weeks.
>
> Actually, there do seem to be a number already, plus swig bindings.
>
> Regarding swig:
>
> Given the swig supports Lua pretty well, and that swig bindings  
> work on lots
> of different languages, is there any advantage to hand-rolled  
> bindings over
> swig's? Other than efficiency issues, of course, which are likely  
> to be marginal.
>
> Is there any kind of central repository of swig bindings that I can  
> pillage?
>
> --
> âââDavid GivenâââMcQââ "There are two major products  
> that come out of
> âââdg@cowlark.comâââââ Berkeley: LSD and Unix. We  
> don't believe this to be
> ââ(dg@tao-group.com)ââ a coincidence." --- Jeremy S. Anderson
> âââwww.cowlark.comââââ

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFdGWsGJtHlJZfjQoRAkdfAJ9VzEGGF+P3jOIMFqAC6zYQ6qfdfACggxic
nm3N9O8yvltqvEUg3yk9ISc=
=4OzZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----