Re: syntaxic shugar proposition : generic do block

[Andreas Stenius <kaos@...>]

Mildred skrev:
[...]
> What do you think ?

I'm not sure I follow what your syntax would expand to... or how you'd 
like to use it. Can't make sense of it.

[...]

> Maybe it could be possible to define ... even outside variadic
> functions. It would just expand the vararg of the enclosing function.

I agree, I've run across this too.
My work-around was to pass the ... to the enclosed function..

//A