[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: boolean operators
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:40:56 -0300
> your needs would be satisfied if the lexer recognized + as the first
> character in a numeric lexeme, no?
Unfortunately, the lexer can't do that because x+10 would be two tokens,
x and +10, not three, x + 10.
- References:
- Re: boolean operators, Glenn Maynard
- Re: boolean operators, Rici Lake
- Re: boolean operators, Glenn Maynard
- Re: boolean operators, Rici Lake
- Re: boolean operators, Glenn Maynard
- Re: boolean operators, David Jones
- Re: boolean operators, Nick Gammon
- Re: boolean operators, David Given
- Re: boolean operators, Glenn Maynard
- Re: boolean operators, Rici Lake