lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 08:53:52AM +0100, Paul Hudson wrote:
> Correct. Functions would be fine, but it would help us if the library was
> built in or otherwise deemed an "official" extension (so that it would
> continue to be updated as Lua evolves, and the APIs would be kept similarly
> stable to Lua's core APIs).
... and probably it would help in order to make them candidates
for LuaJIT inlining.

Any objections to consider Reuben's bitlib the de facto standard?