I have no idea what caused the random emoticons in my previous message
below. Apologies for the line noise
-----Original Message-----
If management wants :-)avascript because they think end-users are familiar
with it, I can understand that. If management want something that looks like
:-)avascript, behaves somewhat like :-)avascript except where it doesn't,
then I think you need new management :-)
In other words, I think the problem is :-(ua's not :-)avascript (i.e. both
syntax and semantics matter), not that :-(ua doesn't look like :-)avascript
(only syntax is the problem)?
P.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 19/09/2006