Re: Multiple functions: was the gc

[Wim Couwenberg <w.couwenberg@...>]

> I myself wanted to be able to alter functions to use the globals of
> the thread in which they are invoked as opposed to having the hassles
> of managing multiple closures for multiple lua threads.

No hassle.  My previously posted example uses only a *single* closure 
for each thread (have a peek.)  However...
> ... lua_setfenv/setfenv() with nil as the 
> special value that indicates the environment should be the "dynamic 
> environment". By that meaning use the environment of the current thread 
> as opposed to the inherited environment at creation time.
I like this idea (reminds me of the Lua 4 days too...) and would like to 
add another suggestion: store the environment of a closure in an UpVal 
and pass the UpVal pointer around instead of the raw Table pointer. 
(This was suggested to me a *long* time ago by Rici.  Where is he by the 
way?)  This has the advantage that a setfenv changes the environment of 
all "related" closures at once, e.g. all closures defined in a single 
script/module.  This makes the "single level" setfenv problem mentioned 
by Willieam Ahern go away in many (all?) relevant cases.
--
Wim