[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Garbage Collection bottleneck
- From: Tim Gogolin <tgogolin@...>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:40:58 -0500
Yep, the removal of "for k,v in myTable do" syntax was probably the
biggest lua source conversion hassle for us as well. getn/setn was
also a big one, but we put that off by defining LUA_COMPAT_GETN, and
fixed the getn()/setn() problems at our leisure (we don't need to
define the macro anymore).
-- Tim Gogolin
On Jun 21, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Ashwin Hirschi wrote:
My upgrade to Lua 5.1 wasn't easy at all, BTW...
the pairs enforcement on for loops was particularly painful
(thousands of updates for this one)
Indeed. I still don't get why this was done... (at all)
I am so *not* looking forward to ever port our stuff over to 5.1.
no signature is a signature.