lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Yep, the removal of "for k,v in myTable do" syntax was probably the biggest lua source conversion hassle for us as well. getn/setn was also a big one, but we put that off by defining LUA_COMPAT_GETN, and fixed the getn()/setn() problems at our leisure (we don't need to define the macro anymore).

-- Tim Gogolin
Adobe Systems

On Jun 21, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Ashwin Hirschi wrote:

My upgrade to Lua 5.1 wasn't easy at all, BTW...

[snip< snip<]

the pairs enforcement on for loops was particularly painful (thousands of updates for this one)

Indeed. I still don't get why this was done... (at all)

I am so *not* looking forward to ever port our stuff over to 5.1.


no signature is a signature.