[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: class implementation
- From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 11:03:05 -0500
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 3:04 am, Lisa Parratt wrote:
> I can tell you for free that I'd be aggravated if any of the class
> systems floating around the list were made language standard - to my
Amen!
for slightly different reasons: to me OO programming is nice; but each project
i've had where it was an advantage, sooner or later it has to do some ugly
kludges because of the OO model, and it was always a different kind of
kludge.
that's why i feel that a more basic functional model (like Lua's) is more
generic, and if you want OO, after designing your classes, it's trivial to
design a OO model to fit them, and not the other way around.
IOW: each OO implementation has it's pros and cons, it's better to build just
the one you feel better for each specific project, and not impose an
arbitrary one as "official"
--
Javier
Attachment:
pgp_wbEdJN0Kb.pgp
Description: PGP signature