[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: Embedded Lua
- From: "Nijdam, Marc" <mnijdam@...>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:01:43 -0700
And on some systems the "standard" definitions don't even exist. As part
of our port to BREW we actually went through and renamed the standard
dependencies so that we could easily identify them as part of the
porting of Lua to various platforms. Made life a lot easier for the
embedded side and the default definitions for the more standard
environments was very straightforward.
-----Original Message-----
From: lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br
[mailto:lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br] On Behalf Of D Burgess
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:42 PM
To: Lua list
Subject: Re: Embedded Lua
Roberto Ierusalimschy wrote:
> It may be a good idea to have proper names for standard functions
> used by the core, not for the easiness of redefinition, but for
> documentation of the core dependencies.
I dont see the problem. The linker documents the dependencies.
