That is really interesting. I've used metatables for extending LUA syntax to
C datatypes but I didn't realize you could attach garbage collector actions
to them. This approach is quite interesting. It doesn't directly solve my
problem in that it doesn't expose the C pointers stored in LUA data
structures to the gc in C. Thus the C garbage collector will still see the
C objects stored in LUA as unreachable. However what your solution does do
is to allow the LUA gc to automatically deallocate objects from C using say
the standard malloc and free approach. That's pretty close to having a
garbage collector, though all the destructors will have to be written
explicitly and on the C side of things the C garbage collector will have to
be dropped or disabled.
Actually, I wasn't suggesting dropping the C garbage collector. I
was suggesting making the Lua __gc metamethod call the C garbage
collectors "release()" or whatever on the C pointer than exists
in the user type. I don't think I can explain it very well but
hopefully you get the idea.
The reverse should also work if your C garbage collector has a hook
when items are collected. You attach the C garbage collector's
equivalent to __gc to a Lua variable and have it release the Lua
objects as needed.
--
// Chris
