Not... entirely... correct on either count!
t = {}
for n = 1,10000 do
table.insert(t,n)
end
collectgarbage("collect")
print("MEM:",collectgarbage("count"))
for n = 1, #t-1 do
table.remove(t, 1)
end
t.foo= "bar" -- <---- LOOK! MAGIC!
collectgarbage("collect")
print("MEM:",collectgarbage("count"))
table.foreach(t,print)
prints:
MEM: 210.0732421875
MEM: 18.1123046875
1 10000
foo bar
The (well-discussed, but perhaps not documented, as an
implementation detail) reason is that Lua only considers
shrinking a table's allocation on a non-nil new-index
write. (Empirically only a non-array non-nil new-index
write, at that.)
Cheers,
--Adam
