[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Problems with lposix on win32
- From: Philippe Lhoste <PhiLho@...>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:47:47 +0100
Edgar Toernig wrote:
Chris Marrin wrote:
errno is pointless. Unlike C, Lua has multiple return values.
And I would suggest to use strings like "ENOTEMPTY" instead of
errno numbers. The numbers are totally useless.
I agree. Perhaps old habits are hard to forget...
PS: I don't like the name osex. I'd simply put them into os.
Me too. It may be embarrassing if later somebody ask if osex is safe...
Indeed, they could go on os, or perhaps in fs as Rici points out.
I wonder, for putenv/setenv. In Linux, does this change the global
environment, or just the environment of the current process?
In WinNT, it is possible to do either. In Win9x, it is near impossible
to change global environment, unless changing AUTOEXEC.BAT and
rebooting, or using some low level trick (I know a MS exe is able to do
this).
--
Philippe Lhoste
-- (near) Paris -- France
-- http://Phi.Lho.free.fr
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
- References:
- Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Wim Couwenberg
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Ryanne Thomas Dolan
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Wim Couwenberg
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Rici Lake
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, D Burgess
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Edgar Toernig
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Chris Marrin
- Re: Problems with lposix on win32, Edgar Toernig