[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: continuing continue - was Re: [patch] continue statement
- From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:45:20 -0500
On Saturday 24 September 2005 9:03 am, Chris Marrin wrote:
> For such a simple patch, it seems like a big win.
i'd like to see have continue too.
so far the biggest drawback seem to be the introduction of a new keyword... am
i wrong?
--
Javier
Attachment:
pgpWcY2aesrDb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
