[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?
- From: Wim Couwenberg <w.couwenberg@...>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:53:20 +0200
> From 5.0 to 5.1 I guess we had a tradeoff between simplicity and
> ease-of-use. We lost ease-of-use, but we gained simplicity, as the "in
> table" was a special case that needed both a special explanantion on the
> manual and special code to run.
Sorry, but that feels like cheating a bit. I think Ashwin's comment
applies (equally well) to the difference between 4.0.1 and 5.1.