[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Why can't I do for...in on a table?
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:17:35 -0300
> But I do mind if in the process we somehow lose the simplicity and
> ease-of-use t hat we had previously.
Sorry, I am afraid I got you wrong. I thought you were talking about
>From 5.0 to 5.1 I guess we had a tradeoff between simplicity and
ease-of-use. We lost ease-of-use, but we gained simplicity, as the "in
table" was a special case that needed both a special explanantion on the
manual and special code to run.