Re: Size of a non numerical indexed table

[Wim Couwenberg <wcou@...>]

> Vague bells are telling me that it's related to passing varargs where 
> one the the arguments is nil - it might require the old varargs support 
> to be enabled - I'll have a better look later.

Keep in mind that the construction

    { <expression> }

does not set the n field and does not use table.setn.  This means that 
table.getn might return an unexpected value if the expression contained 
nil fields...

The implicit arg variable in vargarg functions in 5.0.2 did define the 
correct size of the vararg table.

--
Wim