[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Making LuaSQL roar?
- From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:58:26 -0500
On Sunday 14 August 2005 5:52 pm, Klaus Ripke wrote:
> For persisting tables,
> clearly is ok and nice, but using luatdb instead
> is much faster. like really much.
what i'd like to see is a direct interface from Lua to the SQLite bytecode, or
even better to the tables engine. from what i've seen it's similar to BDB,
but having a SQL interface for other processes is very nice...
> You'd only use a SQL DB if there is some good external
> reason to do so, typically accompanied by some
> table structure interface you have to match.
or when the underlying engine is really so good to offset the burden of SQL;
lots people seem to think that's the case with SQLite (i haven't tried it,
but i could believe it)
Description: PGP signature