lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Monday 20 June 2005 7:59 am, Erik Hougaard wrote:
> But a certification should of cause be "lua.org approved" - both the
> test and the company behind.

that's the most important point!

I too think a certification can be valuable; but any such thing should be 
reviewed first by the _real_ authorities on all things Lua, and we know who 
they are.

i guess these 'High-Level Certifications' guys have (or have contacted) some 
real Lua developers to design and/or review their tests.  anybody here knows 
who are these?

-- 
Javier

Attachment: pgptXjS5c3ea5.pgp
Description: PGP signature