Re: poll on luac

["Peter Loveday" <peter@...>]

> (For what it's worth, my people are not relying on
> non-native byteorder support.  We were taking advantage of
> bytecode's OS-independence for a while, but we stopped doing
> this when we got a 64-bit server.)

Indeed.  The fact that we don't have portable byte-code between 32 and 64 
already makes it non-portable between different Lua environments.  Wouldn't 
make any difference to us...

Having said that, I'd rather see the ability to load 64/32 bit versions on 
other hosts added to make it portable, than lose endian.  But one without 
the other is more or less pointless.

Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday